DISSERTATION

Paper Code: 
VAP 422
Credits: 
2
Contact Hours: 
30.00
Max. Marks: 
100.00
Objective: 

This paper will enable the students to-

  1. Search relevant data for the finalized concept and topic.

  2. Collect primary data through interviews, personal meetings and visits.

  3. Evaluate and sieve the relevant data and write with critical thinking.

  4. Learn to be away from dishonesty and plagiarism and follow the ethics of writing a research 

  5. Defend their conclusion in front of a jury.

 

COURSE OUTCOMES:

Course

 

Course Outcomes 

Learning and teaching strategies

Assessment Strategies 

Paper Code

Paper Title

 

VAP 422

 

Dissertation

 

The students will be able to-

CO89: Evaluate the chosen area through collected data   primary and secondary. Effectively apply knowledge of research methodology in writing the research .

CO90: Evaluate the data collected through interviews, personal meetings and visits.

CO91:  Critically analyse and evaluate the knowledge and understanding of critical writing skill.

 

CO92: Create a sense of responsibility for using the acquired knowledge in benefitting society.

 

CO93:  will learn to be away from Plagiarism and dishonesty  and follow the ethics of writing research

 

CO 94:  Present and evaluate the conclusion responsibly, critically and objectively.

 

Approach in teaching:

Interactive Lectures, Discussion, Tutorials, Reading assignments, Demonstration.

 

Learning activities for the students:

Self-learning assignments, Effective questions, presentation, Giving tasks.

 

Semester end examinations, Continuous Assessment Test, Sketching, layouts, Solving problems in tutorials, Assignments, Presentation, Individual and group projects, regular ,display and submission of artworks.

COURSE CONTENT:

The students will have to submit the final Dissertation after checking plagiarism, authenticity, and social benefits in the field she has chosen, in five copies along with a soft copy in CD with the practical submission. A Viva is to be conducted by a jury of two experts examiners

 

Academic Year: